Saturday, July 16, 2011

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers." (Henry V)


.....Several readers have indicated that they would like to know a little more of my experiences in WWII that would warrant the award I received of the DFC, (Distinguished Flying Cross.)  I have been reticent about writing or speaking about anything  I had done because the memories of these events are painful, and have required the need for therapy; for the PTSD that evolved, although in WWII it was called “battle fatigue”.  But in deference to my readers, most of whom are former students-- during my years in the classroom they never really knew too much about me.  In deference to them I will recount one of the more dangerous acts that occurred in mid flight in the Bay of Biscay—not too far from the shores of Spain and France. Our mission this day was to hunt and kill enemy submarines that were causing havoc to the shipping of weapons across the Atlantic to our allies. But first let me bring to your attention the criteria for the award of the DFC.

. Criteria: The Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Armed Forces of the United States, distinguishes himself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty. The extraordinary achievement must have resulted in an accomplishment so exceptional and outstanding as to clearly set the individual apart from his comrades or from other persons in similar circumstances. 

…..Let me tell what I encountered this day as simply as I can.  We all had to check our turrets and the 50 caliber machine guns that were operated hydraulically.  Don Fraser was busy in the nose turret when his guns jammed. He had problems getting them into working condition. I volunteered to replace him in the turret to see whether or not I could fix the problem.  Down on the ground, during training, I was pretty good at getting jammed guns unjammed.The working condition of the nose turret guns was of extreme importance in the event we were attacked by enemy aircraft. As I lowered myself into the turret-- ,just at that moment two Junkers 87 Stuka German fighter planes swooped down at us out of the clouds; I was swiftly able to get the turret and guns in working condition and I notified our pilot, Lt. Noehren to that effect and he took evasive action even though he never saw the planes.  But then I witnessed these two fiersome aircraft flying directly toward me while I occupied the turret. With great good fortune (or was it skill?) I was able to hit, with my bullets, one of these planes and severely disabling the other. 

.....My condition was not of the best; I was shaking uncontrollably. I never had occasion to kill anyone, never fired a weapon in anger at anyone,and I was suddenly saddened by the fact that I killed, most likely, a young man who had his whole life before him, and now he was dead because I had the good fortune to hit my targets as quickly as I did.  I witnessed a thin plume of smoke emanating from one aircraft and then a great flame that caressed its whole body as it plunged into the sea. Perhaps this man left a wife and kids back home; perhaps parents who would grieve endlessly at their loss. I found these thoughts very unsettling; I left that turret as quickly as I could and I found an empty pineapple juice can and promptly threw up into it.  Now, dear reader, study once more the criteria for the award of the DFC to see for yourselves whether or not I deserved this medal, and whether or not I was totally remiss in not recounting this event—or others—in the classroom during my years as a teacher.

20 comments:

  1. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netJuly 16, 2011 at 9:53 PM

    Dear Cuzzin, you deserved the medal without doubt: but I'm also so pleased that you are now able to write about your wartime experiences. I'm not going to spout a lot of psychobabble about how much good speaking out will do you, because I nothing about that: and "that whereof we cannot speak, we must perforce be silent." (Not sure who said that - ??Wittgenstein perhaps.) But it is important that these memories get preserved for posterity, or they will die when you do. My beloved late father, Woolf "Stan" Sokoloff, fought in the North Africa campaign, and at the Battle of El-Alamein, a battle that lasted a fortnight. He never spoke or wrote about his experiences: so now they are lost forever. All we have are his medals, which have been promised to my youngest, Manny. "The rest is silence." (Now - who said that, I wonder!)
    You are very charitable to the family of the man you killed. What did they ever do to stop Hitler killing 6m. of our people? And of course a warrior has to kill people - it's his job, and he'll face a Court Martial if he doesn't at least try! Not to mention the fact that if he hesitates in killing the enemy, they'll kill him first!
    Also very considerate of you to have your technicolour yawn into an appropriate receptacle. That really WAS above and beyond the call of duty, ha ha. Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  2. BOTTOM LINE - YOU DESERVED THE MEDALS.

    DEGREE OF GUILT - ZERO. The plane came at you, you did not go looking for it. You had a right, a duty, and an obligation to defend yourself, for which the four siblings should be grateful as well as the progeny of your fellow crew members. YOU DID YOUR DUTY, and should be proud of same.

    INFORMING THE STUDENTS - NEGATIVE. You did just fine keeping this information to yourself until it was appropriate to dispense it, which is now.

    In the distant past we went over these and other, similar matters time and again. You did the right thang, and a grateful nation acknowledged that by awarding you TWO DFCs.

    Btw, as I told you, I know of no other ENLISTED man below the age of 21 to receive TWO DFCs. Be proud and do not question your noble deeds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Since your wartime experience cause you much pain and discomfort, not talking about them all these years is natural. we tend to compartmentalize our memories keeping the happy ones at the forefront,

    As for whether or not you "deserved" your medals, that us usually an arbitrary decision made by someone far from the front lines based solely on the reports submitted by your fellow crew mates.

    A hero DOESN'T want to be recognized with awards, he does his job/duty with a requisite anonymity, that shows his true courage and fidelity.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Baron does not think that the award of his DFCs resulted from an "arbitrary decision". What he did in battle clearly and definitely satisfies the criteria for the medals and need not require reports from crew mates. He saved their lives.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netJuly 17, 2011 at 6:43 PM

    To change the subject for a moment: dear US relatives, so sorry that the US didn't win the Women's Football Final. Penalty shoot-outs suck anyway: footballers should be made to play until a result emerges, or be ordered to a replay. They aren't REAL football. Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thank you for sharing. I knew you had nightmares and I never expected you to tell us your experiences. This makes you even more of a hero in my book.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I hope your readers realize that none of your children has ever heard this story. If we did, I'm sure it would have helped us understand you better.
    The story itself is amazing. Rather than concentrate on the fate of the Nazi pilot, perhaps it would be a valid enterprise to realize that a Higher Power, or the Greek Fates, wanted YOU in the forward turret, instead of the rear or belly -- precisely because YOU needed to be the one to save your crew. Embrace that fact instead of grieving for a warrior who would have been celebrating over a beer the fiery descent of your plane into Biscay.
    I believe we (and others) would like -- nay, deserve! -- to read an expanded version. It seems like a great Readers Digest piece -- one that doesn't concentrate only on the intense actions, but investigates the philosophies as well.
    If we are going to send a philosopher into battle, we must at least hear his version.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jon: Medals, especially ones of the highest order, are not awarded by "arbitrary decisions," and they are not based "solely on reports." You can be sure that if a significant medal is awarded, the decision has gone through a rigorous review process that measures up to the highest standards.
    I also don't know that you can say that a hero "doesn't want to be recognized with awards." How do you know that? It is very unlikely that a hero carries out the act of valor simply to receive a medal, but can you point out anyone who has rejected such awards once they are offered because they don't want to be recognized?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Indeed, the Baron is correct once again. Lesser medals may, at times, be awarded somewhat carelessly, but the DFC is special and only goes to those who have truly earned it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "The rest is silence." - Hamlet's final words.

    In case you did not know it, Hamlet's last name was Ross, an ancestor of Le Baron Rouge.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Joel, when i said a hero "doesn't" want awards, i meant most times a hero gets an award in wartime it usually means some of his closest friends have either been grievously wounded or killed. most heroes would trade the award for having his buddies back and or whole. Most heroes do not like talking about their heroics, they consider what they did to be part of their duty at the time.

    since everyone is taking affront to my statement about 'arbitrary decisions" notice i said "most medals", I was not in any way denigrating Baron's actions, however i noticed during my time in the service that awards can and are given out for reasons that sometimes make no sense, and people that are truly deserving do not get recognized because they were just doing "their job"

    while i can not right now remember any specific person not accepting an award, recently on 60 minutes Sgt Gunta who received the Medal of Honor was interviewed. He was asked "what kind of a soldier he was", he replied " i was a good soldier, and consider how great the ones who don't get recognized with awards must really be".

    ReplyDelete
  12. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netJuly 18, 2011 at 2:07 PM

    Baronets and Baronettes: I'm so pleased that your dad has felt able to open his lips to the four of you at last. My sister and I could, and obviously still can, only guess at what my dad had been through. Occasionally we got a clue. Here's an example. He grew a lot of fruit and vegs, and kept the birds at bay with nets. If a bird got caught in the nets, he would simply kill it rather than let it fly free. We thought that that was horrible - then it dawned on us that he'd probably had to kill PEOPLE. And had to witness much worse things than a dead sparrow. Hard to listen to as it might have been, I'd still rather know than not know how his war had shaped him. Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  13. Jon, you are totally confused. For example you write "...most times a hero gets an award because some of his closest friends...have been killed" Why would he get an award because a friend has been killed? That's nonsense. Medals are awarded for heroic acts. Read my blog carefully and then characterize my actions and then give me the damn medal. I'll wear it with honor.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Jon: Not to belabor the point, but I'm still confused by your words. You state "most times a hero gets an award in wartime it usually means some of his closest friends have either been grievously wounded or killed." Huh? Where are you obtaining your data for such comments? "Most times"? "Usually means"? It seems to me that common sense dictates that a medal is awarded because the recipient took actions precisely to prevent his comrades form being harmed.
    It is probably true that some people are awarded medals without deserving them, or many have not received medals when they should have. However, to imply that "most" medals are given out arbitrarily sounds to me like an insult to our soldiers. If you disagree with me, I dare you to say that to a bemedaled Marine.

    ReplyDelete
  15. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netJuly 19, 2011 at 2:35 AM

    Jon - the Baron is right. The word "because," as it suggests, implies causation. It sometimes happens that someone gets a medal relating to an OCCASION when his comrades-in-arms lose their lives, but there is no link pertaining to cause and effect. Time for you to smarten up your English. And might I ask - have you ever done anything to rival the Baron's actions, imbued as they were with both courage and great presence of mind? Unless you have, I'd keep your rather simplistic and dismissive and utterly misguided views to yourself. Otherwise people might start to think that you're compensating and covering up for some possible inadequacies and insecurities of your own. Sorry to be so brutally frank, but that's the kind of lady I am! You'll just have to live with that - everyone else has to! Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  16. Cuzzin Ruth, although we have never met, I am RH+'s son. I served in the US Navy for 10 years and saw combat multiple times(off Libya in 1986, In the Persian Gulf in 1987, and during Desert Storm in 1991). I have NEVER implied that Norman did not deserve his Medals and I know he wears them with pride.

    What I was saying is that Heroes do not perform heroic acts simply to receive a medal. A fireman does not run into a burning building to earn an award, he is concerned with saving the person that is trapped inside.

    as to Joel asking a question about my comment, Marcus Lutrell, was the only survivor of a Seal team that was attacked and was awarded the Silver Star for his actions during the firefight. I am sure he would give back his Silver Star to have his friends and buddies back today.

    I received awards and commendations for my service both during peacetime and wartime service, and i am proud of each and everyone.

    I will never have anything but the utmost respect for Normans wartime service because I understand exactly what it means to be in combat, and how being under an enemies guns affects ones mind, body and soul.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Jon: Thank you for your service. You were in combat, "under an enemy's guns"? Please tell us your story of battle and how you survived your own life-or-death onslaught, which allows you to understand "exactly" the consequences. And I'm not referring to Cousin Ruth's straight forward words.

    ReplyDelete
  18. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netJuly 20, 2011 at 10:19 AM

    Hello Jon - and welcome as yet ANOTHER cuzzin! In your reply to me, you HAVE taken better care about the way in which you have expressed yourself - and it shows! Already your thoughts have come across (to me at any rate)as much less simplistic and out-of-place. Whether or not they should have been given utterance on the Baron's blog is a matter I leave to you and to him to resolve. Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  19. See July 18th posting. Continue comments there if you desire. This posting has a new record for comments; 19 Geeezzz.

    ReplyDelete