Tuesday, September 15, 2009

"It is proved already that you are little better than false knaves." (Much Ado)

.....I simply cannot believe that I've taken to writing blogs again, albeit not quite too often. It seems that whenever a thought comes into my head, albeit not quite too often I have to write it down and pound it to death. Right now it involves health care. From the time I had surgery on my leg on June 15 right up until this day I have had the very best of health care...the kind of care I believe every person, because they are human, needs and deserves, and not only in this country. We don't have it here....in the most powerful and wealthiest State in the world. I cannot make myself abide by the reasons given for not accomplishing this...at least here--here in America, and not turned down by a sign waving mob. Not having every one of our citizens covered is not moral, and as Obama has said, "not in our country's character."


.....Today I received a comment about my "invective" against a rowdy, disrespectful, racist filled mob of ignoramuses, who came--not for a protest--but for a lynching. Perhaps she had a "hard time" reading my blog, because she was born in 1950 and I in 1924. She never had the luxury of experiencing the kind of America I fought for...and this is not it. Not when some hate-filled Senator from South Carolina, no matter his party, can get up in the Congressional chamber and shout at the President of the United States, "You lie!" when he didn't. I know what was not said by him--"You lie, boy!" This guy, I learned, belonged to the Sons of Confederate Veterans and conducted a campaign to keep the Confederate flag atop South Carolina's state Capitol in 2000. In this morning's paper, Mareen Dowd of the NY Times said that she believed "....the frantic efforts to paint our first black president as the Other; a foreigner, socialist, fascist, Marxist, racist, Commie, Nazi; a cad who would snuff out old people; a snake who would indoctrinate kids" has much to do with race. And so do I believe it.

.....The commenter was not there, as I was, when I listened to Martin Luther King's words that still ring in my ears. She may not have read as I did that one GOP activist said a gorilla that had escaped from a zoo was one of Michelle's ancestors. Dowd goes on to say, "Some people just can't believe a black man is president and will never accept it. For two centuries the South has feared a takeover by blacks or the Feds. In Obama they have both." I believe the reason for the "Tea Party" in DC was to bring down the health plan, and thus the President. Just check out the sponsors. The Baron, too, as is the commenter, a true believer in free speech, but that does not mean one should say anything at all or do anything at all in the name of free speech. There has to be a line. Shouting "You lie" at the President during a speech in our Congress crosses that line. Give me a break.


.....I think I'll go along now with the Platonic idea that only philosopher kings should run a country. Now, if we change our form of government so that only the nobility would reign, the Baron would have a chance to make the laws as he sees fit. And the first law he would make would be to have Hershey's make only dark chocolate. It's healthier and would bring down the cost of health care.

8 comments:

  1. All is well with the world. The Baron, in full splendor, has returned to his renowned blog. His pain level has decreased to where it is manageable and will soon disappear altogether.

    Instead of surrendering to his maladies, the great man said, "Le Chaim" and took a positive attitude towards the beauties of this Earth. And the most beautiful is love because love is a bridge between this world and the next.

    By getting a hitch for his scooter, he will once more be mobile which will be good for the economy, especially that of the casinos.

    Rhoda, the Baroness, deserves major credit for m'lord's progress. As wound nurse, companion, and general factotum, she performed invaluable services to the One so many of us love.

    So, well done, Doc, for returning to the fray. Your zest and/or lust for life will invigorate all of your non-Twitter following.

    ReplyDelete
  2. On a sadder note, Hindy and I and our whole family are still unable to express our grief at the passing of Bobby's wife. The best we can do is to say how sorry we are.

    We went through a parallel tragedy when I was about Bob's age, and none of us has fully recovered after all these years.

    Because Bobby is strong, he will continue to live the best life possible. May God bless him and all the rest of us, and help us to make the most of the time we have here on Earth.

    Love to all the Rosses.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just a kind suggestion: If you belittle any of your blog commentators, you might end up scaring them all away. I recall that one of your stated reasons for taking a break from blogging is because you kept getting yourself into trouble when straying into controversial areas. I'm remaining anonymous only because I fear that you might attack me for some unintentional slight. In any case, welcome back!

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Baron,whose reading comprehension is first rate, fails to see where a commentator has been "belittled." He merely pointed out the reason for disparate views was caused perhaps by differing experiences. There is nothing wrong or belittling involved in our debate. If there was belittling at all, it was directed at the extremists the Baron belittled. The commentator certainly wasn't "attacked". Baron advises those who are fearful of being "attacked" to comment anonymously. Besides, Baron writes blogs to vent...not to entertain readers.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Dear Anonymous: Baron's email is norrho1@comcast.net. Please write and point out where the "belittling" occurs that you object to. And hundreds of newspaper columnists "stray" into controversial areas...
    And Baron should not? Where's the fun in that?He's not fearful of trouble for expressing an opinion with some passion. He lives for it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What reading comprehension? 1st, the original commenter did not state any "disparate views" that opposed the Baron's views; she only stated that his "invectives" against the protesters (and this term was used accurately in this context) made it difficult for her to read the blog. Rather than disagreeing with you, she goes on to agree with you that civility is sadly lacking. With that in mind, it can be easily surmised that the difficulty she had in reading the invectives was not because she disagreed with the Baron, but that the Baron was being uncivil himself.

    Keeping that in mind, a long stretch of words then "belittle" the innocent commenter by hinting that her "disparate views" (what disparate views? She had agreed about the lack of civility.) Her difficulty in reading such a blog, the Baron announces, was a result not of a lack of intelligence or facts, but because she is too young (she's actually over 45), did not attend the requisite rally, and did not read the necessary article that embued the Baron as the only one with wisdom. That is belittling to a person who has had her own unique experiences that have taught her life lessons as valuable as ones the Baron havs learned.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Anonymous: When Robin says "America has always had freedom of speech and assembly." To me that's a disparate view of what Baron had to say about the "freedom" and the "assembly" of the DC mob. They crossed the line. Robin appears to imply that she doesn't agree with my assessment of their assembly--and there's nothing wrong with that. Secondly, it is belittling to the Baron to imply that because of what he has to say means he feels he's the only one with wisdom. That's ridiculous. Baron admits he has no wisdom at all--just experience. And thirdly, the Baron never said that his experiences were more "valuable", merely that they were different because she wasn't living in the WWII America, and that's not a value, just a fact. And fourthly, does anonymous really mean that the "rally" was "requisite" as he says? What rally? And requisite means "required". So does Anonymous really think it was required? And if so, why?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Since Red Baron's reading comprehension is a self-proclaimed "first rate," I suppose mine is just 2d-rate, and that must be were I went wrong. because I thought the commentor's words were "America has always ENCOURAGED freedom of speech and assembly," while Baron comprehended the words as "America has always HAD freedom of speech and assembly." To me, these are two different meanings. But even if their the same, it doesn't seem a disparate view from the Baron, whom I thought was saying that the "mob" was abusing those rights. My bad.

    ReplyDelete