Tuesday, October 25, 2011

"Blessed art thou among women" (Bible)

.....RH+, unfortunately has been ill of late.  She is quite frail, having lost weight without knowing why or how.  She has no appetite and has no energy to do the things I have seen her do.  Her nephrologist called one morning and told her to go to the hospital because she was dehydrated and her kidneys were not functioning properly and she needed to take care of that.  She was in the hospital four days and while I was alone in the house I was reminded of an article and a book by Ashley Montagu titled "The Natural Superiority of Women."  And I agreed with him.  He maintains that women by nature & biologically, are superior to men. Scientific tests indicate that the female brain is more highly developed structurally and functionally and it is capable of  thinking more soundly and intuitively than the male brain, Montagu says. The end result is that women are more insightful and have greater stamina and longevity--or, in other words, women stand the test of time.

.....According to Montagu, women are the carriers of the true spirit of humanity, as best captured by the love of a mother for her child.  It is the preservation and diffusing of that kind of love that is the true function and message of women. While I was alone in the house I got a somewhat different view of the superiority of women.  I realized all the work that RH+ does in our home.  She takes responsibility for our meals; she does all the grocery shopping; does the laundry--and there is a lot of it; she folds--neatly--anything that needs folding; she cleans the table of dishes, cups, and silverware when we finish our lunch & dinner; she tends to making the bed after we rise in the morning; she takes care of the pillboxes of our medication--no easy job; she pays the medical bills; she goes to the board meetings; she just finished four years of her presidency of our City of Hope chapter; she does cleaning when needed; on holidays, birthdays, and anniversaries no one goes without getting a card from her; and when I need help, she is there for me. And the final proof that shows how superior women are to men is when she shows her love and kisses me.  No man can do that for me.




25 comments:

  1. you are both lucky to have each other. you make each other complete. RH+ may do a lot of the work, but you are there to support her, as much as she is there to support you.

    neither of you are frail, because you hold each others love in your hearts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would expect nothing less from a man who names himself Ashley.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ellin Bliss Jaeger (North Shore '58)October 26, 2011 at 1:32 PM

    That is a lovely comment from Jon. We are wishing RH+ speedy recovery and a diagnosis that will lead to the appropriate treatment and amelioration of these kidney problems. (Sorry, that's a mouthful!)

    ReplyDelete
  4. In the UK, our view of the superiority of women came to an abrupt halt during the premiership of Mrs Margaret Thatcher. "A net curtain fell over the UK" is how I put it. Tell Rh+ to drink plenty of fluid all the time! It is a good prophylaxis against many maladies. Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  5. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netOctober 26, 2011 at 5:26 PM

    I'm NOT Anonymous!!! I'm ME, everyone!!!
    However, I'm sure you can all tell the difference between us: "Anonymous" is visionary and apocalyptic, but I'm strictly practical. (However, there are merits to both approaches, I will agree.) Anyway, dear Cuzzin Baron, just to report that your wonderful son Joel has sent me a box of the legendary Mallomars, and they are just as delicious and desirable as you have indicated! YUM YUM YUM!!! Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  6. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netOctober 27, 2011 at 2:17 PM

    I love the Mallomars so much, that I am in danger of becoming an addict, or so Joel informs me. I have decided to set up a group called "Mallomartians Anonymous." ("I'm Ruth - and I'm a Mallomartian" - heavy sigh....)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ruth, what is the origin of the prefix "mal"?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks for the great post. Those who come to read your article will find lots of helpful and informative tips.

    ReplyDelete
  9. "dissertation writing" is a company in the U.K. that writes papers that students need. I clicked on it in the comment here and strangely it took me to England. I have no clue as to how they glommed Baron's blog.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netNovember 3, 2011 at 3:13 PM

    They seem to me to be disgrace to this sceptred isle! Students should write their OWN dissertations: anything else is plagiarism and cheating!! I repudiate them hereby!!! No, Baron, you will never know how whoever it was found your blog: individuals click on and on, and carry on clicking their way to sites that take their fancy. What is "glomming" btw?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Back in the days of Damon Runyon, his guys and dolls used "glomming" to mean capturing and/or stealing. Today, it seems that the expression can also refer to attaching oneself to another person who may or may not want this attachment.

    Speaking of plagiarism, some fraternities at Columbia kept a file of term papers on various subjects. One football player submitted such a paper to Prof. William Casey, the eccentric and delightful economics professor.

    The football was astonished to receive this grade:

    A--I always give this paper an "A."
    However, YOUR grade is an "F" for plagiarism. Please come to my office at your earliest convenience.

    ReplyDelete
  12. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netNovember 4, 2011 at 3:20 PM

    That was one VERY funny story, Phil! I've now Googled "glomming," and both the meanings you mention are given by the usual sources. Derivation of the word - a bit vague, but possibly from Scottish "glam," to steal. Not sure I believe that one. Glad you're back on the radar! Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  13. I have to confess that during my undergraduate Cornell days, one way I earned some money to pay tuition was to write English papers for other people. Once, I wrote a paper for a graduate student at another university, and she received an "A." The next semester, I thought I would get more mileage out of it and submitted it for my own class. It received a "C." I wanted to appeal, but I didn't think I would win if my main argument was "This already received an A at the graduate level!"

    ReplyDelete
  14. To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is research. (Sorry for the paraprosdokian)

    ReplyDelete
  15. "To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is research. (Sorry for the paraprosdokian)"
    Isn't this plagiarism, since it is a verbatim quote from http://www.englishforums.com/content/humour/paraprosdokians.htm

    ReplyDelete
  16. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netNovember 4, 2011 at 9:09 PM

    Joel - all your anecdote shows is that Cornell has higher standards than the institution of learning which the other student attended. You were quite right not to appeal! Cuzzin Ruth x

    ReplyDelete
  17. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netNovember 4, 2011 at 9:16 PM

    Paraprosdokian - great stuff, Baron. My favourite one was recently said about the novelist C P Snow. It ran: "as novelists go, Snow has gone."

    ReplyDelete
  18. To Anonymous: First of all there are quotation marks around the figure of speech. It is not plagiarism since it is a well known, often used paraprosdokian for which the author has been forgotten; your education must be deficient if you never heard it around campus; and secondly, I know nothing about the link you sent, but I'm glad you did because I enjoyed the website.

    ReplyDelete
  19.  “Copy from one, it's plagiarism; copy from two, it's research.” attributed to playwright Wilson Mizner. I dunno, maybe he plagiarized it. Wonder where the term "paraprosdokian" comes from? Is it a "term" or a "figure of speech"?

    ReplyDelete
  20. ruth.grimsley@virign.netNovember 5, 2011 at 11:51 PM

    It's so wonderful that nearly everything in speech has a name. "To have a name is to be" - the late Benoit Mandelbrot, he of the beautiful computer generated sequences. Actually, I've named a hitherto unnamed phenomenon of speech. An "onomatopoeia" is a word that sounds like what it is - eg, "shriek." Already named! But what do you call a word that conjures up the emotions that the thing inspires? Mod Greek for wasp: "spsika." ("Eek!") Answer: a meta-onomatopoeia. Incidentally, the "dok-" bit of paraprosdokian is about being proper and fitting - in A/Gk. The rest of the word turns this meaning on its head. Marvellous, almost orgasmic in my view! Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  21. I coined a phrase for which there was no other, but not as cool as a part of speech: niblings. That is: the children of siblings. There are parents, grandparents, siblings - all referring to the male and female persons of that relationship, but nieces and nephews heretofore had no generic term. I do not mind who gets the credit but I look for it to be used in common vocabulary.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Ok so I don't know how or why I got to this page while researching paraprosdokia, onomatopoeia, and such:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constrained_writing

    But I think it is germane to the linguistic interests and abilities of Red Baron and many of his followers. Perhaps a book or collection of works of "constrained writing" could occupy Red Baron, and could make him even more famouser.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Now there are 20 (now 21) comments attached to this blog post about the natural superiority of women & most of the comments have nothing to do with the blog...I believe this blog is not a venue for conversation & idle banter. Hopefully, the comments might be a little more attached to the theme of the article. That is, if the Baron deigns to even write another article...which I dearly hope he does.

    ReplyDelete
  24. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netNovember 6, 2011 at 7:44 PM

    Well, Anonymous, now that the Baron has written another article, I feel at liberty to comment. The Baron's blog is NOT a venue for conversation and idle banter, you're right on that point. However, it has proved a venue for enlightened and enlightening discussion, sometimes veering from the original subject of the blog posting. I respectfully ask, what is the nature of your objection to that? A bewildered Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous: This blog entry veered from the original topic only because the Baron himself inserted comments about plagiarism, glomming, and paraprosdokians -- words and topics about which his enlightened readers cannot *not* comment.

    ReplyDelete