Tuesday, December 1, 2009

An English Lesson (Ross)

.....Remember the other day I wrote that language was oral, not written. Writing is only a weak imitation of language. It does not have the rhythm or the music of language; the connotations, or the dialects. And when one attempts to teach the "grammar" of English, for example, it's not very accurate to define the parts of speech using the traditional methodology. To say a noun is a person, place, or thing is a very weak definition. A structural linguist (such as the Baron) would define a noun as a word that could be inflected for the plural MORPHEME. A morpheme is the SMALLEST UNIT in the language that carries and conveys a unique meaning and is grammatically appropriate. That includes the sound of [ess] in banks, the [iz] in catches, and the [z] in engines. All indicating that the word carries the MEANING of plural.


.....the "PHONEMES" of the plural morpheme are the SOUNDS that make the following nouns, plural: bet(s), bed(s) hors(es), ox(en). Remember a "morpheme" carries MEANING (such as denoting plural); a PHONEME is the sound of the morphemes (ess), (z), (iz), and (en). And I will make this a college lesson in English for you, so you can get your BA. All the latter morphemes, as a group, are called "Allomorphs" of the English plural morpheme. Get it? Now don't blame the Baron for this. My cousin Ruth in England wanted to know more about English (as if she didn't already know a bundle)! Now, is there any good in knowing all this? Probably not. Except that John Fitzgerald Kennedy once said, "In a time of turbulence and change knowledge is power."
.....I have nothing else to say. I'm all worn out from teaching this lesson.

6 comments:

  1. Very enlightening. I think the blog is taking a new direction after all these years. Can you please tell people why they should not say "Where is the car AT?"

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, of course the AT is an addendum--unnecessary an non-standard English. However, when Winston Churchill was told not to end a sentence with a preposition he said, "This is the kind of nonsense up with which I will not put."

    ReplyDelete
  3. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netDecember 1, 2009 at 10:10 PM

    Well, cuzzins both, prepositions at the end of sentences are inelegant. But "to put up with" is a phrasal verb, so the the word "up" is part of the verb. "With which I will not put up" is better, but mixes formal with vernacular English, not always a good idea. "Which I will not tolerate" is the best phraseology here.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ruth.grimsley@virgin.netDecember 1, 2009 at 10:11 PM

    Beautiful essay, Cuz, quite unassailable. Cuz Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  5. ruth.grimsley@vrgin.netDecember 1, 2009 at 10:20 PM

    Yes, grammar is descriptive, not prescriptive, but often has to be treated as prescriptive, or we'd never get anywhere in learning a language quickly. The best way to learn a language is to go to where it's spoken - but that means time and money, and most of us don't have enough of either. And where dead languages are concerned, it's impossible anyway. Love to you all, Cuzzin Ruth

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't think the "AT" in the sentence above is the same grammatical structure as Winston's dangling "with." One does not ever hear "At where is the car?" or "Where at is the car?" And "Where is the car?" works fine without that darn AT thrown in at the end, like some mashed 'taters splattered on a wall, slowly ebbing downward, where the dogs of the house are awaiting its arrival. I will not up with this tolerate.

    ReplyDelete