.....Since I vented my views on the situation with Penn State, I have read in newspapers and magazines and have heard commentators on TV excoriate the NCAA for the harshness of the penalties inflicted on the university. These media people expressed their opinions much more vehemently than I did on my blog the other day.
*(Portions of the following article originate on ESPN.com)
.....A source familiar
with the investigation into Penn
State 's response to
former assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky's child sex abuse scandal is
speaking out against the NCAA.
.....According to The Chronicle of Higher Education, a person
connected to the Freeh report, which condemned Penn
State 's handling of Sandusky 's abuse, said the NCAA should not
have based its harsh sanctions against the university on the investigation.
.....The NCAA took this
report and ran with it without further exploration," the source said.
"If you really wanted to show there was (something) to cover up, interview the
coaches. See their knowledge and culpability ..." The failure to do so, according to the source, has
damaged Penn State .
....."The sanctions against Penn State
were really overwhelming, and no one imagined the report being used to do
that. Instead, Mark Emmert, NCAA President, took the
report and used Penn
State 's own resources to
do them in. The institution is made of people, too. And they don't deserve
this."
(.....Meanwhile,
former Penn State
players Franco Harris, Rudy Glocker and Christian Marrone have sent an e-mail to other
Penn State alumni saying the Freeh report "is highly flawed, and factually
insufficient.)
.....I do hope that the new administration at Penn State and its coaches will appeal the NCAA penalties which they so richly undeserve.
the meaning of the term "speak to" in your quotation. When we've
established that, I'll know better what issues we're discussing.
Cuzzin Ruth
the right" to raise an army.
recent words of wisdom. I can't believe they've all deserted
you! Have you told them that you're back in business?
Cuzzin Ruth
was not going to read this blog any more. I am truly sorry
that my political views may have annoyed him. Or it
might be something else. I just don't know. But if he
doesn't want to read my blog, I must respect his action
for whatever reason, because he's my friend. As for
anyone else not commenting perhaps they have
nothing to say. If they read your comment, perhaps
they will. But I do have you!